October 20, 2006 (587-10202006)

The drug addict woman the celebrity society has been funding and supporting in the Kansas City facility again last night (Thursday, October 19, 2006) transmitted the signal she uses to induce the comatose state of sleep and induced a comatose state of sleep rendering me unconscious between the hours of 8:30PM and 11:20PM, again leaving me in harms way unable to defend or protect myself and unable to react in situations of emergency. I believe under current law the celebrity society can, and in my opinion should be prosecuted and or sued, if for nothing else, under the term of “criminal negligence.” In at least two areas the current celebrity society is in fact “negligent.” Number one; the celebrity society is “negligent” under the sub topic of flailing to find, fund, and support, someone that wasn’t negligent. In this case, someone that wasn’t under the influence of illegal drugs 24 hours a day. Number two; the celebrity society is in fact guilty of “negligence” under the sub topic of "failure to act.” In this case, “failure to act” upon the more than 570 letters I personally wrote, emailed, mailed, faxed, published, etcetera, stating that I was being hurt by the drug addict woman, her company, and her three friends. I further believe under current law the drug addict woman, her company, and her three friends can also be prosecuted and or sued for “criminal negligence.” In this case, the repeated "negligence” of connecting herself, her three friends, and other devices including currents of voltage electricity which resulted in and caused sores, sickness, and other bodily harm on my physical body which also resulted in hospitalization and extreme emotional distress. In addition to the above, there is the fact that the drug addict woman, the same drug addict woman the celebrity society has been funding and supporting, did in fact burglarize my apartment which is a crime, and during the burglary did in fact tampered with my food which in itself is another crime, in this case with chemicals that did in fact cause “black” and other lethal forms of mold. I believe the fact is even if I couldn’t prove intent to kill, the fact that she number one; committed the crime of burglary, number two; during the burglary committed the crime of food tampering with chemicals that did in fact cause and expose me to lethal, harmful, “black” and other types of mold, is at very minimum not only extremely “criminally negligent” but in fact an “intent to kill” which is in reality, “attempted murder.” It took less than 10 minutes research for me to find the below definition of negligence which I copied from a lawyer referral website. 

Beginning of Quote;

What is "Negligence"?

Generally speaking, when someone acts in a careless way and causes an injury to another person, under the legal principle of "negligence" the careless person will be legally liable for any resulting harm. This basis for assessing and determining fault is utilized in most disputes involving an accident or injury, during informal settlement talks and up through a trial in a personal injury lawsuit.

Specifically, in negligence claims the plaintiff (the person injured) tries to show that the defendant (the person supposedly at fault):

*Owed a legal duty of care to the plaintiff under the circumstances; and

*Failed to fulfill ("breached") that legal duty through conduct or action (this can include a failure to act); and

*Caused an accident or injury involving the plaintiff; and  

*Harmed or injured the plaintiff as a result.

End of Quote.

I personally have written more than 570 letters since 2002 seeking help forcing this drug addict woman, her company, and her three friends off the light of God, God’s people and I, yet to this very day Friday, October 20, 2006 there has been absolutely no recourse whatsoever against her, her company nor her three friends  by the celebrity society funding, supporting and protecting her, nor by the Federal Government whom in reality is supposed to protect innocent citizens of the United States against thugs such as this drug addict woman, her company and her three friends.

Stephen Wayne Reno Friday, October 20, 2006

One would think the much larger consortium as a whole could at minimum find someone, someone other than the current group of celebrities that has no affiliation with the drug addict woman, her company, and her three friends. Perhaps someone that hasn’t shamed the entire consortium with their continued support of, funding of, and protection of, the drug addict woman, her company, and her three drug addict friends. 

You know, I personally witnessed an indignant Reba Mcentire as she exclaimed that she thought that she should be “thanked” and I’m wondering, do you suppose she thinks she should be thanked by the light of God and God’s people that witnessed as she supported, funded, and protected this group of drug addicts that did these things to not only myself but also to the light of God and his people to, or her very own peers, an entire industry of folks  whom she has shamed with her continued support, funding, and protection, of this drug addict woman, her company and three friends? Kind of makes you wonder Humm, just what type of thanks do you suppose Reba Mcentire is  expecting?

Advertisements
This entry was posted in News and politics. Bookmark the permalink.